SCOTUS Dashboard

The Docket

Upcoming

No cases

Argued

2025 Term · 24-38

Circuit Split
Little v. Hecox

Argued Jan 13, 2026

Listen on Spotify ↗

2024 Term · 23-1122

Free Speech Coalition v. Paxton

Argued Jan 15, 2025

2024 Term · 24-656

TikTok, Inc. v. Garland

Argued Jan 10, 2025

View all 5 cases →

Decided

2025 Term · 25-365

Trump v. Barbara

Decided Jun 30, 2026 · 8–1

Listen on Spotify ↗

2025 Term · 24-43

West Virginia v. B.P.J.

Decided Jun 30, 2026 · Unanimous

Listen on Spotify ↗

2025 Term · 24-621

NRSC v. FEC

Decided Jun 30, 2026 · 8–1

Listen on Spotify ↗
View all 55 cases →

Current Circuit Splits

These active circuit splits are currently before the Supreme Court. Cert has been granted and a decision is pending.

Constitutional Law★ SCOTUS pending2 circuits

Whether state laws categorically barring transgender women from women's sports teams violate the Equal Protection Clause, and what level of scrutiny applies to such classifications.

Circuits are beginning to divide on the constitutionality of state laws that categorically prohibit transgender athletes from competing on teams consistent with their gender identity. This split implicates the level of scrutiny applicable to sex-based and transgender classifications and whether as-applied challenges are viable under intermediate scrutiny.

Laws likely violate Equal Protection

Holds that categorical bans on transgender women in women's sports likely violate the Equal Protection Clause as applied to transgender individuals who have medically mitigated their sex-based biological advantages.

Laws are constitutional

Holds that such laws are a permissible exercise of state authority to maintain fair competition in women's sports based on biological sex differences.

Constitutional Law/Religious Liberty★ SCOTUS pending4 circuits

Whether the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act (RLUIPA) clearly authorizes individual-capacity damages suits against state prison officials, and whether Congress has the constitutional power under the Spending Clause to impose such personal liability.

Circuits disagree on whether RLUIPA's text provides sufficiently clear notice to authorize damages claims against prison officials in their individual capacities, implicating Spending Clause limits on Congress's ability to impose personal liability on individuals who are not direct recipients of federal funds.

RLUIPA authorizes individual-capacity damages

Holds that RLUIPA's text and structure provide clear authorization for damages suits against state prison officials in their individual capacities.

RLUIPA does not authorize individual-capacity damages

Holds that RLUIPA does not clearly authorize individual-capacity damages suits against prison officials, and the Spending Clause limits Congress's ability to impose such liability on non-recipients of federal funds.

Source: CourtListener · Analysis: Claude AI · See all circuit splits →

Cases by Circuit

Upcoming and pending-decision cases mapped by the federal appeals court circuit they originated in. Hover over a state or badge to see cases. Bold lines show circuit boundaries; thinner lines show state borders.

211

Badge colors

Upcoming argument
Argued, awaiting decision

Click a state or badge to see cases. Bold lines show circuit boundaries.

Pending cases by circuit

1st Circuit

2nd Circuit

3rd Circuit

4th Circuit

5th Circuit

2 cases (2 argued)

6th Circuit

1 case (1 argued)

7th Circuit

8th Circuit

9th Circuit

1 case (1 argued)

10th Circuit

11th Circuit

D.C. Circuit

Court Calendar

Oral argument sessions and conference dates for the October Term 2025. Argument dates link to case pages. Conference dates are when the Justices meet privately to discuss pending petitions and argued cases.

July 2026
Sun
Mon
Tue
Wed
Thu
Fri
Sat
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
Oral ArgumentConferenceToday

July 2026

No events this month.

Justices

Speaking turns and estimated speaking time per justice across all 2025 term oral arguments, ranked by time on record.

Justice Jackson

Justice Jackson

419.7 min

Speaking time

1,016 turns

Speaking turns

24 opinions
6 majority9 concurring9 dissenting
Justice Sotomayor

Justice Sotomayor

276 min

Speaking time

923 turns

Speaking turns

23 opinions
5 majority13 concurring5 dissenting
Justice Kagan

Justice Kagan

251.3 min

Speaking time

545 turns

Speaking turns

15 opinions
5 majority4 concurring6 dissenting
Justice Kavanaugh

Justice Kavanaugh

240.8 min

Speaking time

820 turns

Speaking turns

16 opinions
6 majority9 concurring1 dissenting
Justice Gorsuch

Justice Gorsuch

223.9 min

Speaking time

934 turns

Speaking turns

20 opinions
7 majority11 concurring2 dissenting
Chief Justice Roberts

Chief Justice Roberts

196.2 min

Speaking time

797 turns

Speaking turns

9 opinions
6 majority3 concurring0 dissenting
Justice Barrett

Justice Barrett

186.8 min

Speaking time

491 turns

Speaking turns

16 opinions
7 majority7 concurring2 dissenting
Justice Alito

Justice Alito

182.1 min

Speaking time

526 turns

Speaking turns

16 opinions
5 majority6 concurring5 dissenting
Justice Thomas

Justice Thomas

66.7 min

Speaking time

265 turns

Speaking turns

29 opinions
6 majority19 concurring4 dissenting

Counsel

Attorneys with 2 or more cases in the 2025 term, ranked by speaking time. Click a name to see the cases they argued.

1
265.4 min

Speaking time

5 cases

Cases argued

2
199.3 min

Speaking time

3 cases

Cases argued

3
116.3 min

Speaking time

4 cases

Cases argued

4
99.2 min

Speaking time

2 cases

Cases argued

5
93.6 min

Speaking time

3 cases

Cases argued

6
72.9 min

Speaking time

2 cases

Cases argued

7
70.9 min

Speaking time

2 cases

Cases argued

8
23 min

Speaking time

2 cases

Cases argued

About

This site tracks upcoming and recent oral arguments before the United States Supreme Court. Case information is compiled directly from official Supreme Court records, including transcripts, docket filings, and published opinions. Summaries, legal term explanations, and party position analyses are generated using AI and are intended to orient readers and direct further human research and analysis. They should not be treated as legal advice or authoritative legal commentary. Click any case to read a plain-English breakdown of the facts, the legal question, and each side’s argument. The site is updated automatically each day at 5pm ET. Built by William Higgins. For comments or suggestions, contact william.higgins@sciencespo.fr.